PMT-Manifest: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen
Zur Navigation springen
Zur Suche springen
| Zeile 4: | Zeile 4: | ||
=== Problem statement === | === Problem statement === | ||
* | * _No processes_ are fastest in execution but produce _random quality_ | ||
* | * _Too many processes_ are slow in execution and produce _suboptimal quality_ | ||
* A motivated team that anticipates the quality goals produces higher quality than a demotivated team that follows a complex process | |||
=== Solution === | === Solution === | ||
| Zeile 11: | Zeile 13: | ||
* Only a high risk justifies an expensive process | * Only a high risk justifies an expensive process | ||
** Risk mitigation is the driver for designing processes | ** Risk mitigation is the driver for designing processes | ||
* Constantly improve processes: | * Constantly improve processes: | ||
| Zeile 20: | Zeile 19: | ||
* Accountabilities must be clear: | * Accountabilities must be clear: | ||
** An accountable person can weight cost, schedule, team-motivation, product-quality, process-compliance and decide which one to drop. | ** An accountable person can weight cost, schedule, team-motivation, product-quality, process-compliance and decide which one to drop. | ||
* Human decisions over Tools I: | |||
** If a human wants to make a change, a tool may request a rationale and it may complain, but a tool may not stop her/him. | |||
* Human decisions over Tools II: | |||
** If a tool wants to make a change, it must not overwrite data entered by humans. A tool may have own status fields instead. | |||
Version vom 7. Dezember 2024, 04:51 Uhr
Andis PMT Manifest
Problem statement
- _No processes_ are fastest in execution but produce _random quality_
- _Too many processes_ are slow in execution and produce _suboptimal quality_
- A motivated team that anticipates the quality goals produces higher quality than a demotivated team that follows a complex process
Solution
- Only a high risk justifies an expensive process
- Risk mitigation is the driver for designing processes
- Constantly improve processes:
- If time, money and motivation spend on a process do not mitigate a severe risk, change the process
- Accountabilities must be clear:
- An accountable person can weight cost, schedule, team-motivation, product-quality, process-compliance and decide which one to drop.
- Human decisions over Tools I:
- If a human wants to make a change, a tool may request a rationale and it may complain, but a tool may not stop her/him.
- Human decisions over Tools II:
- If a tool wants to make a change, it must not overwrite data entered by humans. A tool may have own status fields instead.